Europe is well on its way to hampering its own mobility with strict AI regulations and is missing out on any technological advantage.
European member states seem determined to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) to the point where innovation disappears, while China and the United States are positioning themselves as world leaders in this field. The European Union presents its legislation as a protection mechanism for citizens and businesses, but in reality it risks becoming a drag on technological progress and economic growth. The impact on mobility and transport in particular could be disastrous if Europe continues to push through its strict regulations.
from regulation to stagnation
While American and Chinese companies are rapidly integrating AI into self-driving vehicles, logistics systems and transport infrastructure, Europe is increasingly imposing restrictions. The AI Act, a law aimed at limiting the risks of artificial intelligence, is presented as a necessary safeguard, but it actually endangers innovative sectors. In the mobility sector, this means that European carmakers and tech companies will have less freedom to develop and test autonomous vehicles.
Tesla and Waymo have been testing self-driving taxis in the US for years, while China is experimenting with large-scale AI-driven traffic systems. Europe, on the other hand, is bogged down in ethical discussions and regulations, which prevent companies from innovating. The focus is not on creating a competitive market, but on minimizing risks – with the result that European companies are left behind and become dependent on foreign technology.
mobility under pressure
Self-driving cars, smart traffic lights and automated public transport can make European traffic more efficient and safer. Less traffic jams, lower CO₂ emissions and fewer traffic accidents are achievable goals with AI technology. But if European regulations are stricter than elsewhere in the world, companies will choose to test and roll out their innovations outside Europe.
Dutch and German car manufacturers, once leaders in technology and innovation, have long warned about the consequences of strict regulations. Volkswagen and BMW are increasingly investing in AI technology outside Europe, where there are fewer legal restrictions. This is not only a loss for the European economy, but also for citizens, who will have to wait longer for the benefits of AI in transport.
The choice is simple: either Europe remains a player on the world stage, or it becomes a buyer of foreign innovations and loses control over its own mobility.
The European Commission defends its regulations, claiming that strict controls are needed to prevent abuse and ethical problems. But this approach ignores the global reality: AI continues to develop, regardless of European restrictions. The only difference is that European companies are not given a leadership role and technological progress takes place elsewhere.
China and the US are taking a pragmatic approach. They acknowledge the risks of AI, but understand that excluding innovation would put them at a disadvantage. Europe, on the other hand, seems to be clinging to a morally superior position, without considering the economic and strategic implications.
European mobility at stake
If Europe wants to remain competitive, it must not only regulate but also actively invest in AI development. The future of mobility depends on advanced technologies that optimise traffic flows, make cars safer and make logistics processes more efficient. This can only happen if there is room for experimentation and innovation.
Instead of stifling regulatory policies, Europe should strike a smart balance between oversight and incentives. Governments should invest in AI research, foster collaboration between tech companies and car manufacturers, and create test facilities where new technologies can be developed safely.
Without this shift, Europe risks losing its technological edge for good. In a world where AI is the key to economic and geopolitical power, the continent can no longer afford to wait and see.
